IAPE Evidence Blog

IAPE posts the latest headlines and news stories from the web

Categories

  • Articles by State:
    • Alabama
    • Arizona
    • Arkansas
    • California
    • Colorado
    • Connecticut
    • District of Columbia
    • Florida
    • Georgia
    • Idaho
    • Illinois
    • Indiana
    • Iowa
    • Kansas
    • Kentucky
    • Louisiana
    • Maryland
    • Massachusetts
    • Michigan
    • Minnesota
    • Mississippi
    • Missouri
    • Montana
    • Nebraska
    • Nevada
    • New Hampshire
    • New Jersey
    • New Mexico
    • New York
    • North Carolina
    • Ohio
    • Oklahoma
    • Oregon
    • Pennsylvania
    • South Carolina
    • Tennessee
    • Texas
    • Utah
    • Vermont
    • Virginia
    • Washington
    • West Virginia
    • Wisconsin
  • Articles by Topic:
    • Audit/Inventory
    • Burglaries
    • Cash/Money
    • Chief's In Trouble
    • DNA
    • Evidence for Destruct.
    • Firearm Sales
    • Firearms/Guns
    • Hazards
    • I've Got Something
    • Lack of Standards
    • Missing Evidence
    • Narcotics/Addiction
    • Narcotics/Drugs
    • News
    • Officers in Trouble
    • Only In California
    • Purging
    • Signed Out Evidence
    • Standards
    • Suicide
    • Theft
  • Big Three:
    • Drugs/Narcotics
    • Guns/Firearms
    • Money/Cash
  • DNA:
    • Arrests
    • Backlog
    • Exonerated
    • Innocence Project
    • John Doe Warrant
    • News
  • Outside USA:
    • Bancroft ON CN
    • Ipswich Suffolk
    • Melbourne Australia
    • Perth Austrialia
    • Trinidad
    • United Kingdom
    • Victoria Australia
    • Winnipeg MB CN
    • Yellowknife NT CN
    • York England
  • zzzz…

You are currently browsing the archives for the Narcotics/Addiction category.

Calendar of headlines:

September 2010
M T W T F S S
« Aug    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  

Polls

How is DNA Evidence stored in your Department?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Recent Comments:

  • Columbia County Sheriff’s Office Employee Arrested after Embezzlement Investigation
  • Police evidence: Comprehensive inventory control is key to cracking cases
  • Audit reveals almost 200 police firearms can’t be accounted for
  • Bruce Levy will get no jail time for marijuana-toting charge
  • Police Clerk Suffers Bullet Shrapnel Wound

Evidence Tag Cloud:

Arizona Arkansas Audit Burglary in Evidence Rm California Cash/Money Chicago Chief DNA: drugs FL Florida Georgia guns legislation marijuana Michigan Missing Evidence Missouri narcotics officer arrest officer arrested officer charged officer convicted property rm honors Property Rm Theft statute of limitations strange evidence weapons

Archives

  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • August 2008
  • May 2008
  • March 2008
  • June 2007
  • March 2006
  • May 2002
  • August 2000
  • February 1998
  • July 1993
  • November 1987
Site Search:

Archive for the 'Narcotics/Addiction' Category

« Previous Entries

Former Pleasant Hill police officer pleads guilty to drug, burglary charges

Posted by: IAPE August 13, 2010

Des Moines Reg­is­ter
BYLINE: REGISTER STAFF REPORT

Pleas­ant Hill, IA

A for­mer Pleas­ant Hill police offi­cer who stole metham­phet­a­mine from an evi­dence room and crashed his squad car pleaded guilty Thurs­day to drug and bur­glary charges.

For­mer Sgt. Daniel Hebert Edwards, 42, pleaded guilty to pos­ses­sion of a con­trolled sub­stance, oper­at­ing while intox­i­cated, and third-degree bur­glary. His sen­tenc­ing was set for Sept. 29 in Polk County Dis­trict Court.

Edwards was charged shortly after he crashed his cruiser near U.S. High­way 65 and East Uni­ver­sity Avenue on April 1.

Edwards first drove through a ditch along the on-ramp to the U.S. High­way 65 bypass, then struck another vehi­cle and col­lided with a cen­ter con­crete bar­rier. He then drove back into a ditch, with his car com­ing to rest against a fence.

Edwards was fired after tox­i­col­ogy tests showed metham­phet­a­mine in his system.

- — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — -
Inter­na­tional Asso­ci­a­tion for Prop­erty and Evi­dence
“Law Enforce­ment Serv­ing the Needs of Law Enforce­ment”
www.IAPE.org


read user's comments (0)

Former deputy’s alleged tampering could affect hundreds of cases

Posted by: IAPE June 21, 2010

DailyComet.com
Link to Arti­cle
BYLINE: Ray­mond Legendre, Staff Writer

Assump­tion Parish, LA

THIBODAUX — The impact of a for­mer Assump­tion sheriff’s deputy’s alleged tam­per­ing with evi­dence could be felt on hun­dreds of drug cases, pros­e­cu­tors said.

Lt. Louis Lam­bert, 47, who spent seven years as the agency’s evi­dence cus­to­dian, allegedly used cocaine, mar­i­juana and pills from the evi­dence room to feed his drug addic­tion. He faces mul­ti­ple charges, includ­ing 538 counts of malfea­sance in office. Lam­bert, a Labadieville res­i­dent, remains free on a $70,500 prop­erty bond.

Sher­iff Mike Wagues­pack said author­i­ties are still deter­min­ing how many of the affected cases were open. Most were closed and likely won’t be affected, said Assump­tion Dis­trict Attor­ney Ricky Babin. As for those that remain open, “each case is dif­fer­ent,” Babin said. “We’re not going to whole­sale dis­miss cases just because there was tam­per­ing … But if we can’t prove our case, we’re going to dis­miss it.”

Lam­bert came under sus­pen­sion when deputies learned drug evi­dence for a par­tic­u­lar case had been “mis­han­dled,” Wagues­pack said. That prompted a three-month State Police probe that ended with Lambert’s arrest. Wagues­pack has since said he believes Lam­bert is a drug addict who used the evi­dence vault as his med­i­cine cabinet.

The deputy avoided detec­tion until April because there is no need to review evi­dence in closed cases, the sher­iff said.

The out­come of affected open cases will likely be var­ied. Some charges will be dis­missed, oth­ers could result in plea deals.

Babin said poten­tial jurors should not be skep­ti­cal of police tes­ti­mony because of the alle­ga­tions against Lam­bert. It is impor­tant to “iso­late this as one indi­vid­ual instead of putting a label on every police offi­cer,” Babin said.

Lambert’s alleged mis­han­dling of evi­dence can serve as a pow­er­ful learn­ing tool for law-enforcement agen­cies across the state, said Hal Turner, exec­u­tive direc­tor for the Louisiana Sheriff’s Asso­ci­a­tion. Turner knows first-hand the dif­fi­cul­ties Wagues­pack faces because he expe­ri­enced a sim­i­lar sit­u­a­tion about 17 years ago while he was sher­iff of Allen Parish, he said.

“We try to remind our other mem­bers to update audits on stuff,” he said, “not just think that just because some­body is a good guy that it won’t hap­pen … It’s a bad thing, but if you don’t learn from it, it’s more likely to repeat itself.”

Babin said poten­tial jurors should not be skep­ti­cal of police tes­ti­mony because of the alle­ga­tions against Lam­bert. It is impor­tant to “iso­late this as one indi­vid­ual instead of putting a label on every police offi­cer,” Babin said.

Lambert’s alleged mis­han­dling of evi­dence can serve as a pow­er­ful learn­ing tool for law-enforcement agen­cies across the state, said Hal Turner, exec­u­tive direc­tor for the Louisiana Sheriff’s Asso­ci­a­tion. Turner knows first-hand the dif­fi­cul­ties Wagues­pack faces because he expe­ri­enced a sim­i­lar sit­u­a­tion about 17 years ago while he was sher­iff of Allen Parish, he said.

“We try to remind our other mem­bers to update audits on stuff,” he said, “not just think that just because some­body is a good guy that it won’t hap­pen … It’s a bad thing, but if you don’t learn from it, it’s more likely to repeat itself.”

Staff Writer Ray­mond Legendre can be reached at 448‑7617 or raymond.legendre@houmatoday.com. Fol­low him on Twitter@cometcrime.

- — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — -
Inter­na­tional Asso­ci­a­tion for Prop­erty and Evi­dence
“Law Enforce­ment Serv­ing the Needs of Law Enforce­ment”
www.IAPE.org


read user's comments (0)

Assumption Parish sheriff’s deputy charged in tampering case

Posted by: IAPE June 13, 2010

DailyComet.com
Link to Arti­cle
BYLINE: Ray­mond Legendre, Staff Writer

Assump­tion Parish, LA

THIBODAUX — A for­mer Assump­tion sheriff’s deputy faces hun­dreds of counts of malfea­sance in office after a three-month State Police inves­ti­ga­tion alleged he used drugs seized as evi­dence by his department’s nar­cotics agents.

Lt. Louis Lam­bert, who spent seven years as the agency’s evi­dence cus­to­dian, allegedly used cocaine, mar­i­juana and pills from the evi­dence room to feed his grow­ing drug addic­tion, Assump­tion Sher­iff Mike Wagues­pack said.

Lam­bert, 47, of Labadieville, had long exist­ing “pain man­age­ment issues” due to a knee injury suf­fered more than a decade ago, the sher­iff added, but it was unclear what role his injury played in his alleged crimes. Lam­bert has not spo­ken to author­i­ties since the inves­ti­ga­tion started.

“It’s a sit­u­a­tion where the indi­vid­ual became addicted and used the evi­dence vault as a med­i­cine cab­i­net,” Wagues­pack said. “This is a sheriff’s worst night­mare as far as evi­dence is concerned.”

Lam­bert was arrested and charged late Fri­day night with 538 counts of malfea­sance in office (tam­per­ing with evi­dence), 17 counts of ille­gal car­ry­ing of a weapon with nar­cotics and one count of pos­ses­sion with intent to dis­trib­ute a sched­ule I nar­cotic. He was also arrested on an out­stand­ing war­rant in Lafourche Parish for obtain­ing a con­trolled dan­ger­ous sub­stance by fraud.

He was being held Sat­ur­day at the Assump­tion Parish jail with­out bond.

It was unclear Sat­ur­day night how many court cases or drug pros­e­cuitions might be affected by Lambert’s alleged actions. Phone calls made to Assump­tion Dis­trict Attor­ney Ricky Babin were not returned.

Wagues­pack said he expects pros­e­cu­tions to go for­ward in many active cases, in which video evi­dence and deputy tes­ti­mony can be used in court.

“This is not a sit­u­a­tion where there will be blan­ket dis­missals of all drug cases,” he assured.

Most of the items Lam­bert is accused of tam­per­ing with were from cases that had already been com­pleted, Wagues­pack said.

Asked why no one dis­cov­ered Lambert’s alleged mis­deeds sooner, Wagues­pack explained there was gen­er­ally no rea­son to look at or deal with evi­dence in closed cases, so other deputies would not have noticed any­thing awry. Lam­bert was a “loyal” employee who gave no signs of drug addic­tion, the sher­iff added.

Staff Writer Ray­mond Legendre can be reached at 448‑7617 or raymond.legendre@houmatoday.com. Fol­low him on Twit­ter @cometcrime.

- — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — -
Inter­na­tional Asso­ci­a­tion for Prop­erty and Evi­dence
“Law Enforce­ment Serv­ing the Needs of Law Enforce­ment”
www.IAPE.org


read user's comments (0)
« Previous Entries
IAPE Evidence Blog is proudly powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).